1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 25 N.J.
  5. 25 N.J. Super. 248 (1953)
 

MAYFLOWER INDUSTRIES v. THOR CORP.

25 N.J. Super. 248 (1953)

96 A.2d 92

MAYFLOWER INDUSTRIES, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF, v. THOR CORPORATION, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND TEL-DISCO, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT, AND MORRIS S. SEGAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND MORRIS S. SEGAL AND SEAMARK REALTY COMPANY, ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS ON COUNTERCLAIMS OF THOR CORPORATION.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 26, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Thomas J. Brogan argued the cause for the defendant-respondent Thor Corporation.

Mr. Daniel G. Kasen argued the cause for the defendant-appellant Morris S. Segal Corporation (Messrs. Kasen, Schnitzer & Kasen, attorneys; Mr. Morris M. Schnitzer, of counsel).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, FRANCIS and JAYNE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, S.J.A.D.

Prior to March 1950 Mayflower Corporation was a distributor of Thor products in the State of New Jersey. The Morris S. Segal Corporation, incorporated in New York, was its sole sales agent for Thor products and other appliances and furniture sold by Mayflower in the State of New Jersey. The Mayflower Corporation having instituted its action in the Chancery Division to restrain the Thor Corporation from terminating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases