1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 204 F.2d
  5. 204 F.2d 35 (1953)
 

NEW WRINKLE v. WATSON

No. 11475.

204 F.2d 35 (1953)

NEW WRINKLE, Inc. et al. v. WATSON, Commissioner of Patents.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided March 19, 1953.

Petition for Rehearing Denied April 7, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. H. A. Toulmin, Jr., Dayton, Ohio, with whom Mr. F. E. Drummond, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellants. Mr. Herbert H. Brown, Dayton, Ohio, also entered an appearance for appellants.

Mr. J. Schimmel, Atty., U. S. Patent Office, with whom Mr. E. L. Reynolds, Sol., U. S. Patent Office, was on the brief, for appellee.

Before PROCTOR, BAZELON and FAHY, Circuit Judges.

FAHY, Circuit Judge.

In proceedings in the District Court pursuant to Rev.Stat. § 4915,1 appellants sought judgment entitling them to letters patent on the basis of claims set forth in application Serial No. 653,932, relating to the art of producing a coating composition which creates a wrinkle finish when applied to a surface and dried. The court after a hearing filed a memorandum opinion and entered judgment dismissing the complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases