QUEEN v. SISK

No. 172.

78 S.E.2d 152 (1953)

238 N.C. 389

QUEEN et ux. v. SISK.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 14, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles C. Dalton and J. S. Dockery, Rutherfordton, for plaintiff-appellants.

M. Leonard Lowe, Forest City, for defendant-appellee.


BARNHILL, Justice.

The specific land to be conveyed other that that which was actually described in the deed executed by defendant and delivered to plaintiffs is entirely too uncertain to entitle plaintiffs to a decree of reformation or specific performance. They are relegated to their right, if any, to recover the amount erroneously paid defendant at the time the deed was delivered.

What are the rights of a purchaser of real property when it is discovered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases