PATE v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.

No. 32314.

43 Wn.2d 185 (1953)

260 P.2d 901

CARL PATE, Respondent, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al., Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

September 4, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Moulton, Powell, Gess & Loney, for appellants.

Tonkoff & Holst and Blaine Hopp, Jr., for respondent.


WEAVER, J.

Plaintiff was injured while engaged in extra-hazardous work. No report of the accident was made to the state department of labor and industries. No claim was filed by plaintiff, nor by anyone in his behalf, for benefits under the workmen's compensation act. Plaintiff, in his brief, describes his action against defendant employers as follows:

"This is not an action against an employer for injuries received in extra-hazardous employment. Instead,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases