1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 26 N.J.
  5. 26 N.J. Super. 185 (1953)
 

STATE v. D'AMATO

26 N.J. Super. 185 (1953)

97 A.2d 741

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MATTHEW D'AMATO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 17, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Abraham J. Slurzberg argued the cause for the defendant-appellant (Messrs. Solomon & Miller, attorneys).

Mr. Cecil T. Woolsey argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Frederick T. Law, Prosecutor and Mr. William A. O'Brien, Assistant Prosecutor, attorneys).

Before Judges FREUND, STANTON and FRANCIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, S.J.A.D. (temporarily assigned).

The defendant, Matthew D'Amato, appeals from a judgment of conviction under an indictment in two counts charging the crime of bookmaking in violation of N.J.S. 2A:112-3.

The State's case rested upon the testimony of three witnesses, police officers of the Jersey City Police Department's gambling squad, who testified that while they were cruising in a police squad...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases