AMATRUDI v. WATSON


19 N.J. Super. 67 (1952)

88 A.2d 7

SAMUEL AMATRUDI AND ANOTHER, ETC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. WILLIAM WATSON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 17, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Sylvester S. Garfield argued the cause for the appellants.

Mr. Michael A. Dwyer argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Doughty & Dwyer, attorneys).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, BIGELOW and FRANCIS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BIGELOW, J.A.D.

The plaintiff-appellants were co-partners carrying on the business of cleaning buildings and other structures by means of sand blasts. They had in their employ a foreman named Communale. The defendant saw Communale and three laborers at work one day and engaged them to come that afternoon and sandblast the floor of his swimming pool. Work on the pool took four or five hours. Defendant paid Communale $80, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases