MAYFLOWER INDUSTRIES v. THOR CORP.


9 N.J. 605 (1952)

89 A.2d 242

MAYFLOWER INDUSTRIES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THOR CORPORATION, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, AND TELDISCO, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 16, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Meyer E. Ruback argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Ruback, Albach & Weisman and Mr. Alfred C. Clapp, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas J. Brogan argued the cause for the respondent Thor Corporation.

Mr. Sol D. Kapelsohn argued the cause for the respondent Teldisco, Inc. (Messrs. Kapelsohn, Lerner, Leuchter & Reitman, attorneys).


PER CURIAM.

The orders will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinions of Judge Francis in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 6.

For reversal — None.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases