PUCCIO v. CUTHBERTSON


21 N.J. Super. 544 (1952)

91 A.2d 424

MARJORIE PUCCIO AND HARRY PUCCIO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. GERALD CUTHBERTSON AND WALTER CUTHBERTSON, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 3, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Sol Hoberman argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for the defendants-respondents (Messrs. Major & Carlsen, attorneys).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and FRANCIS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, S.J.A.D.

On motion of the defendants, the Law Division dismissed the complaint without prejudice, on the ground it failed to set forth a cause of action. The plaintiffs appealed from the ensuing judgment.

Aside from the recitals of ownership, possession and control of the premises in the defendants, and that the status of the plaintiff, Marjorie Puccio, was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases