HIPKE v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.


261 Wis. 226 (1952)

HIPKE, Appellant, vs. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 4, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Gold & McCann of Milwaukee, and oral argument by William R. Gold.

For the respondent Industrial Commission there was a brief by the Attorney General and Mortimer Levitan, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Mr. Levitan.


GEHL, J.

Appellant complains that the commission's "findings of fact" do not comply with the requirements of sec. 102.18 (1), Stats., which direct:

"After final hearing the commission shall make and file its findings upon all the facts involved in the controversy,...."

He submits that specific findings should have been made relating to exits, the procedure of blowing the pits, and other matters with respect to which he claimed the defendant had violated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases