1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 369 Pa.
  5. 369 Pa. 112 (1952)
 

SHAULL v. A.S. BECK NEW YORK SHOE CO., INC.

369 Pa. 112 (1952)

Shaull v. A.S. Beck New York Shoe Co., Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January 7, 1952.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. Brewster Wickersham, with him Metzger & Wickersham, for appellant.

Wm. E. Shissler, with him Nauman, Smith, Shissler & Hall, McNees, Wallace & Nurick, Samuel A. Schreckengaust, Jr., Earl V. Compton, and William J. Lescure, for appellees.

Before DREW, C.J., STERN, STEARNE, LADNER and CHIDSEY, JJ.

OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE HORACE STERN, January 7, 1952:

Having in mind that summary judgments should not be entered on pleadings save in very clear cases the present judgments must be reversed and the mutual rights and liabilities of the parties left for determination at a trial of the issues.

The A.S. Beck New York Shoe Co., Inc. was the lessee of certain premises on Market Street abutting in the rear on Court Street in the City of Harrisburg. It engaged R...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases