BOOST CO. v. FAUNCE


17 N.J. Super. 458 (1952)

86 A.2d 283

BOOST COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. RANDLE B. FAUNCE, E. LESTER STOCKTON, SR., RANDLE N. FAUNCE, E. LESTER STOCKTON, JR., AND DRINK ATOAST, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 6, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. W. Louis Bossle argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant.

Mr. Charles A. Cohen argued the cause for the defendants-respondents (Messrs. Worth & Worth, attorneys).

Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.


The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, J.A.D.

In its appeal, the plaintiff-appellant, Boost Company, abandons argument on the alleged predatory trade practices of defendants and concerns itself with the single question as to whether defendants' acts constitute a breach of trust in using knowledge of the "Tak-Aboost" formula obtained while engaged as employees of the plaintiff-company in the manufacture and sale of a soft drink syrup known as "Atoast,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases