SUBSEQUENT ETC. FUND v. IND. ACC. COM.

Docket No. L.A. 22202.

39 Cal.2d 83 (1952)

244 P.2d 889

SUBSEQUENT INJURIES FUND OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION and LOIS A. PATTERSON, Respondents.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

May 29, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, and Stanford D. Herlick, Deputy Attorney General, for Petitioner.

Edmund J. Thomas, Jr., Thomas L. Higbee, Reidman & Silverberg and Milton H. Silverberg for Respondents.


The Issues Involved

SCHAUER, J.

The Subsequent Injuries Fund of the State of California seeks review of an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. The attorney general, for the fund, contends that certain of the provisions of the Labor Code (§§ 4750-4755) for subsequent injury payments violate those provisions of the California Constitution which state that the Legislature has "plenary power" to create a system of workmen's compensation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases