CINCIS v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RY.


201 Misc. 887 (1952)

Diomira Cincis, Appellant, v. Seaboard Air Line Railway, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

March 20, 1952.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman A. Coplan for appellant.

Richard Owen and Mark F. Hughes for respondent.

SCHREIBER and HECHT, JJ., concur.


HOFSTADTER, J.

The action is brought by a resident assignee for damage to a lot of tomatoes delivered to the defendant as initial carrier at Palmetto, Florida, for shipment to Montreal, Canada. Though the complaint does not reveal the identity of the plaintiff's assignor, the consignee, it appears from the papers that the assignor is a resident of Montreal. The ground of dismissal is that the maintenance of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases