Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
J. Walter Haynes, Asheville, A. E. Leake, Marshall and Shuford, Hodges & Robinson, Asheville, for plaintiff, appellee.
J. M. Baley, Jr., and Clyde M. Roberts, Marshall, for defendants, appellants.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
STACY, Chief Justice.
The principal question for decision is whether the judgment of Judge Nettles, finding the defendants guilty of contempt, and the judgment of Judge Rudisill, imposing punishments on such finding, or either of them, can be sustained. The record impels a negative answer.
I. The Judgment of Judge Nettles
In the first place, it should be noted that by G.S. § 5-9, "In all proceedings for contempt and in proceedings as for contempt...
NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.
Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.
As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.