BENTLEY v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION

No. 5301.

71 Ariz. 330 (1951)

227 P.2d 224

BENTLEY et al. v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

February 6, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

V.L. Hash and Virginia Hash, Phoenix, for petitioner Thomas M. Collins.

Charlie W. Clark and Marshall W. Haislip, Phoenix, for petitioner Oran L. Bentley.

Evans, Hull, Kitchell & Jenckes, by Norman S. Hull and John E. Madden, Phoenix, for petitioner Farley H. Hennessy.

Jennings, Strouss, Salmon & Trask and J.A. Riggins, Jr., all of Phoenix, for petitioner Fraternal Order of Eagles, Aerie 2407.

H.S. McCluskey, Phoenix (Robert E. Yount and Donald J. Morgan, Phoenix, of counsel), for respondents, The Industrial Commission of Arizona.

Guynn & Twitty, Phoenix, for Amicus Curiae.


DE CONCINI, Justice.

The Commission has filed a motion for rehearing asking the court to reconsider its opinion on the question of whether Hennessy was within the scope of his employment in making the trip to Tucson.

Without reciting the facts we adopt the came as reported in 71 Ariz. 181, 225 P.2d 43 and we adopt the law therein except where it is inconsistent with this opinion on rehearing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases