COHEN v. KASKEL


201 Misc. 146 (1951)

Samuel Cohen et al., Plaintiffs, v. Alfred L. Kaskel et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County.

December 10, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dreyer & Traub for defendants.

Milton M. Carrow and Norman Annenberg for plaintiffs.


CUFF, J.

The defendants move to dismiss the complaint (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 107) for the reason that the contract upon which plaintiff depends violates the Statute of Frauds. In this kind of motion, the proper allegations of the complaint must be deemed proved.

The complaint identifies the parties, then alleges: that on October 13, 1950, plaintiffs agreed to sell and defendants (Kaskel and Redlark) agreed to buy plaintiffs' described real property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases