"MENGAL" v. "MENGAL."


201 Misc. 104 (1951)

Victoria "Mengal", Petitioner, v. Harry "Mengal", Respondent.

Domestic Relations Court of the City of New York, Family Court, Bronx County.

April 17, 1951.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Perl, Hackmyer & Tishelman for petitioner.

Jack M. Wolff for respondent.


PANKEN, J.

The petition herein alleges that respondent and petitioner were married. That is not disputed. The petition alleges that the respondent has failed to provide adequately for the support of the petitioner.

The testimony in this case presents two questions to be determined by the court:

1. Is respondent justified in refusing to live with his wife because of an alleged antenuptial agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases