1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 17 N.J.
  5. 17 N.J. Super. 119 (1951)
 

HEALY v. BILLIAS

17 N.J. Super. 119 (1951)

85 A.2d 527

MARTIN HEALY, GUARDIAN AD LITEM OF NORA HEALY, AN INFANT, AND MARTIN HEALY, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. MILTON BILLIAS AND ANNA K. BILLIAS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 20, 1951.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Nathan A. Reuben argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Philip M. Lustbader argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Schneider & Schneider, attorneys).

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MCGEEHAN, S.J.A.D.

The question is whether the action of the trial judge in sustaining objections to three questions asked a rebuttal witness of the plaintiff constituted such a mistaken exercise of discretion as to require a reversal. In a motion for a new trial, which the trial judge denied, the same question was raised.

The complaint alleged that the infant plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases