MURRAY v. MURRAY

17019.

206 Ga. 702 (1950)

58 S.E.2d 420

MURRAY v. MURRAY.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Rehearing Denied March 27, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene M. Kerr, for plaintiff in error.

Randall Evans Jr., contra.


ATKINSON, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) 1. Though the judgment in the original divorce case had been set aside as being null and void by reason of having been prematurely granted (see Murray v. Dukes, 204 Ga. 865, 52 S.E.2d 468), yet the case was still pending when the hearing on the ancillary petition for temporary support of the child was held, although it was more than three years after the filing of the suit for divorce. Accordingly, with the divorce suit pending, the retroactive portion of the judgment, wherein the child was awarded $450, payable $10 per month, to cover the period from the time the divorce suit was filed until the hearing on the rule nisi, was a proper element of temporary support. Swearingen v. Swearingen, 19 Ga. 265 (4); Wright v. Wright, 117 Ga. 867; Killingsworth v. Killingsworth, 148 Ga. 590 (2) (97 S. E. 539); Conley v. Conley, 152 Ga. 184 (5) (108 S. E. 777); Hobbs v. Hobbs, 158 Ga. 571 (4) (123 S. E. 891).

2. The award of $30 per month for temporary support of the child, and the additional award of $100 attorney's fees, payable $10 per month, were proper items for consideration in the determination of temporary support for a minor child, under Code §§ 30-202 and 30-206.

3. While the three items in the aggregate require the payment of $50 per month, and the evidence showed that the earnings of the defendant were $55 per week, this was a question in the discretion of the trial judge; and this court cannot say, as a matter of law, that the trial judge abused his discretion. Hightower v. Hightower, 202 Ga. 643 (44 S.E.2d 116).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases