CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS v. BRADY

Docket No. L.A. 20871.

34 Cal.2d 854 (1950)

215 P.2d 460

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS, Appellant, v. WILLIAM BRADY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

March 10, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard C. Waltz, City Attorney, and Richard L. Sieg, Jr., Assistant City Attorney, for Appellant.

Reed & Kirtland and Robert E. Moore, Jr., for Respondent.


SHENK, J.

Appeal by the plaintiff from an adverse judgment in an action to enjoin the defendant's alleged violation of zoning restrictions. The appeal is on the judgment roll.

Ordinance No. 443 of the city of Beverly Hills, adopted December 8, 1936, prohibits the establishment or conduct of any business in Zone R-1.5, classified as residential. The establishment or conduct of any business therein is declared unlawful. The word "business," insofar as material...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases