1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 61 S.E.2d
  5. 61 S.E.2d 596 (1950)
 

AREY v. LEMONS

No. 311.

61 S.E.2d 596 (1950)

232 N.C. 531

AREY et al. v. LEMONS et al.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. C. Horn and Joseph C. Whisnant, Shelby, for plaintiffs, appellees.

Falls & Falls, Shelby, for defendants, appellants.

ERVIN, Justice.

Upon an appeal from an order granting or refusing an interlocutory injunction, the Supreme Court may review both the findings of fact and the conclusions of law. Finger v. Rex Spinning Co., 190 N.C. 74, 128 S.E. 467; Coates v. Wilkes, 92 N.C. 376.

The purpose of an interlocutory injunction is to preserve the status quo of the subject matter of the suit until a trial can be had on the merits. Boone v. Boone, 217 N.C. 722, 9 S.E.2d 383; State...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases