ESSICK v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Docket No. L.A. 20835.

34 Cal.2d 614 (1950)

213 P.2d 492

BRYANT ESSICK et al., Appellants, v. THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

January 13, 1950.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl W. Barrow for Appellants.

Morris Lavine, as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Appellants.

Ray L. Chesebro, City Attorney, Bourke Jones, Roger Arnebergh, Assistant City Attorneys, Ugene U. Blalock, Harold S. Morrison, Towson T. MacLaren, Guy Richards Crump and Ralph W. Evans for Respondents.

Donald J. Dunne, as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Respondents.


SCHAUER, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of dismissal of their action for declaratory relief against the city of Los Angeles, the individual members of the council of such city, and Forest Lawn Company, a corporation (hereinafter termed, respectively, the city, the council, and the company). By such action plaintiffs sought to have declared null and void because allegedly violative of various sections of the city charter certain ordinance provisions and one resolution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases