1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 232 S.W.2d
  5. 232 S.W.2d 139 (1950)
 

THOMPSON v. RAILROAD COMMISSION

No. 9900.

232 S.W.2d 139 (1950)

THOMPSON et al. v. RAILROAD COMMISSION et al.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin.

Rehearing Denied June 21, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kelley, Moshiem & Ryan, of Houston, J. T. Suggs, of Dallas, Baker, Botts, Andrews & Parish, of Houston, Wigley, McLeod, Mills & Shirley, of Galveston, Stroud & Dyer, of Dallas, Allen, Gambill & Gambill, Seth Barwise, all of Fort Worth, Kenneth McCalla, Walter Caven, and Austin L. Hatchell, all of Austin, for appellant.

Price Daniel, Atty. Gen., and Durward Goolsby, Asst. Atty. Gen., for Railroad Commission.

Albert G. Walker, of Austin, for Robertson Transports, Inc.

W. D. White, Callaway & Reed, by R. E. Kidwell and O. D. Montgomery, all of Dallas, for Ray Smith Transport Co.

HUGHES, Justice.

Numerous railroad companies, who are appellants, sued the Railroad Commission of Texas and the Ray Smith Transport Company and Robertson Transports, Inc., both of whom are motor carriers, to set aside orders of the Commission, dated April 9, 1949, in which such motor carriers were granted authority to transport certain named acids, caustic soda, and molasses, in liquid form, in bulk in tank trucks to, from and between all points in Texas.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases