1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 3 N.J.
  5. 3 N.J. 348 (1950)
 

IN RE VAN WINKLE

3 N.J. 348 (1950)

70 A.2d 167

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF DANIEL VAN WINKLE FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 3, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Peter J. McGinnis argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Ward, McGinnis & Friedman, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas J. Kennedy argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Murner & Murner, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by BURLING, J.

This is an appeal by Robena Van Winkle and Joseph Greendyke, co-guardians of Daniel Van Winkle, to review an order dated August 19, 1949, of the Passaic County Court for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum and the judgment entered pursuant thereto by said Court on August 25, 1949. The appeal is addressed to the Appellate Division of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases