1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 4 N.J.
  5. 4 N.J. 169 (1950)
 

LOUIS SCHLESINGER CO. v. RICE

4 N.J. 169 (1950)

72 A.2d 197

LOUIS SCHLESINGER COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SAMUEL W. RICE, HELEN B. RICE AND LEO MARKS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 13, 1950.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Charles Danzig argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Riker, Emery & Danzig, attorneys).

Mr. Meyer E. Ruback argued the cause for the respondents Rice (Messrs. Ruback, Albach & Weisman, attorneys).

Mr. Sidney G. Goldberg argued the cause for the respondent Marks.

The opinion of the court was delivered by HEHER. J.

The controversy here grows out of a real estate brokerage contract. On June 19, 1946, the defendants Rice leased their lands known as 288 Frelinghuysen Avenue, in Newark, to the Ken-Rod Manufacturing Co. for a term of ten years commencing the ensuing August 1st, at an annual rental of $46,800. The lease was negotiated by the plaintiff broker; and on the day of the execution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases