1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.2d
  4. 33 Cal.2d
  5. 33 Cal.2d 453 (1949)
 

LOCKARD v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Docket No. L.A. 20383.

33 Cal.2d 453 (1949)

202 P.2d 38

CHARLES C. LOCKARD et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Appellant.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

February 1, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ray L. Chesebro, City Attorney, Bourke Jones and Roger Arnebergh, Assistant City Attorneys, and Thos. H. Hearn, Deputy City Attorney, for Appellant.

Albert H. Allen and Hyman Goldman for Respondents.

GIBSON, C.J.

This is an appeal by the city of Los Angeles from a judgment declaring certain provisions of a comprehensive zoning ordinance invalid and void insofar as it affects the use of a strip of property twelve blocks long within which plaintiffs' property is situated.

The zoning scheme of defendant city adopted in June, 1946, classifies the city into 16 types of districts as follows: Two agricultural districts; one suburban district; five residential...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases