1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 4 N.J.
  5. 4 N.J. Super. 352 (1949)
 

LITTLE v. LITTLE

4 N.J. Super. 352 (1949)

67 A.2d 201

DOROTHY LITTLE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HARRY LITTLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 1, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Louis Santorf (Mr. J. Chester Massinger, attorney; Mr. Martin Kimmel, on the brief) argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent.

Mr. Arthur M. Karl (Mr. Heyman Zimel, attorney) argued the cause for the defendant-appellant.

Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.

The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, J.A.D.

This is a malicious prosecution action. Defendant appeals from an adverse judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury at the Passaic County Court, on the ground that the court erred in submitting the case to the jury for determination.

Summarizing, the facts are: Defendant made a criminal complaint against plaintiff, without seeking legal advice, before

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases