KAUFMAN v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO.


2 N.J. 318 (1949)

66 A.2d 527

EVA KAUFMAN, AS ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE GOODS, CHATTELS, ETC., OF ALEX KAUFMAN, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, GEORGE E. COX AND SAUL WEIDENFELD, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 6, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Milton Miller (Mr. Julius Cohn, on the brief) argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. John A. Hartpence (Mr. John A. Hartpence and Mr. James R. Laird, Jr., attorneys for the respondent The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, and Mr. Hervey S. Moore, Jr., attorney for the respondent George E. Cox) argued the cause for the respondents The Pennsylvania Railroad Company and George E. Cox.

Mr. J. Victor Carton (Messrs. Durand, Ivins & Carton, attorneys) of counsel, submitted brief for the respondent Saul Weidenfeld.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BURLING, J.

The appellant, who was the plaintiff below, appeals from judgments entered upon verdicts for the defendants returned by a jury in the former Supreme Court. The action was brought by the appellant as administratrix ad prosequendum of the estate of Alex Kaufman, deceased, against Saul Weidenfeld, operator of the motor vehicle in which plaintiff's decedent was riding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases