PROSEN v. DUFFY

No. 31737.

152 Ohio St. 139 (1949)

PROSEN ET AL., APPELLEES, v. DUFFY ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 13, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Roland A. Baskin, for appellees.

Mr. Frank T. Cullitan, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Saul S. Danaceau, for appellants.


STEWART, J.

It is conceded that the township trustees certified the zoning plan to the board of elections for submission on November 2, 1948, to the electors of the unincorporated area of the township, as directed by Section 3180-35, General Code, and that ballots were prepared for such election by the board of elections.

The contestees contend that there are two issues involved in the present case:

1. Whether the wording in the ballot complied substantially...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases