1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 3 N.J.
  5. 3 N.J. 210 (1949)
 

BEAM v. KENT

3 N.J. 210 (1949)

69 A.2d 569

HAROLD BEAM AND JOHN J. KNODEL, PARTNERS, TRADING AS BEAM-KNODEL COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. HENRY KENT AND ROBERT E. EISNER, PARTNERS, DOING BUSINESS AS KENT METAL & CHEMICAL WORKS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 5, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Thomas L. Morrissey argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Patrick A. Dwyer on the brief. Messrs. Carpenter, Gilmour & Dwyer, attorneys).

Mr. William H. Osborne, Jr., argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Alfred R. Becker on the brief. Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Ward, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by WACHENFELD, J.

Assuming it was prejudicial, did the trial court err in denying the appellants' motion to strike the opinion testimony of the respondents' expert upon the ground that it was based partly upon hearsay? This is the only question presented by the appeal, which comes here on our own certification.

A jury in the Superior Court, Law Division, Bergen County, awarded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases