GROBART v. SOCIETY FOR ESTABLISHING USEFUL MFRS.


2 N.J. 136 (1949)

65 A.2d 833

MEYER GROBART ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE SOCIETY FOR ESTABLISHING USEFUL MANUFACTURES, IN DISSOLUTION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 25, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John A. Hartpence (Mr. Peter Bentley, attorney) argued the cause for the appellants.

Mr. Josiah Stryker (Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Horner, attorneys) argued the cause for the respondents.


The opinion of the court was delivered by VANDERBILT, C.J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs, Meyer Grobart, Samuel Grobart, Rose Rowitz and Yetta Teitelbaum, from a judgment entered on the pleadings in favor of the defendants, The Society for Establishing Useful Manufactures, in dissolution, and its surviving trustees, individually and as such trustees.

The Society was incorporated in 1791 by a special act of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases