HATFIELD, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 3, 4, 5, and 9 to 15, inclusive, in appellant's application for a patent for an invention for a churn, on the ground of lack of invention over the prior art. Claims 1, 2, 6, 7, and 8 were allowed by the board.
Claims 3, 4, 9, and 14 are typical of the appealed claims. They...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.