1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 170 F.2d
  5. 170 F.2d 437 (1948)
 

AERATION PROCESSES v. WALTER KIDDE & CO.

No. 21063.

170 F.2d 437 (1948)

AERATION PROCESSES, Inc. v. WALTER KIDDE & CO., Inc., et al.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

November 1, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Toulmin & Toulmin, of Dayton, Ohio (H. A. Toulmin, Jr. and Clayton E. Crafts, both of Dayton, Ohio, Hugh M. Bennett, of Columbus, Ohio, and John S. Powers, of Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Floyd H. Crews and Darby & Darby, all of New York City (Edwin T. Bean, of Buffalo, N. Y., and J. William Carson, of Belleville, N. J., of counsel), for defendants-appellants.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

1. We cannot agree with the district judge that this patent is valid. To the facts reported in his opinion (77 F.Supp. 647), we must add one important set of facts that he failed to note: As the patent states, the application, filed September 26, 1935, on which the patent issued, was a "continuation-in-part" of an earlier "co-pending application," filed February 8, 1934. Getz abandoned the earlier application...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases