SPENCE v. MAIER


1 N.J. 36 (1948)

61 A.2d 590

MARY SPENCE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM MAIER, DEFENDANT, DUGAN BROTHERS OF NEW JERSEY, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 18, 1948.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Perry E. Belfatto argued the case for the plaintiff-respondent.

Mr. Joseph Coult argued the case for the defendant-appellant (Coult & Satz, attorneys).


PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Burling in the former Supreme Court.

For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD and ACKERSON — 5.

For reversal...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases