PER CURIAM.
The validity of the patent to Holmes, as to the matters discussed by the district judge and in our opinion, needs no further examination. The ground for rehearing now pressed is that the case in the district court should have been reopened on the timely motion there made to receive newly discovered evidence as to use by others of the patented device more than two years prior to the application of Holmes. Gairing Tool Co. v. Eclipse, 6 Cir., 43 F.2d 73...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.