Plaintiff, as receiver of Mt. Auburn & Osbernville Grain Company (hereinafter referred to as Auburn), filed a timely claim for refund of federal income and excess profits tax which the Commissioner of Internal Revenue rejected. Upon denial of the claim, suit was instituted. The facts were stipulated. They appear in the trial judge's findings reported in D.C.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PINKERTON v. UNITED STATES
No. 9523.
170 F.2d 846 (1948)
PINKERTON v. UNITED STATES.
United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 24, 1948.
November 24, 1948.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
James B. Martin, of Springfield, Ill., Charles E. Bliss, of Taylorville, Ill., and Harry B. Hershey and Lee W. Ensel, both of Springfield, Ill., for appellant.
Howard L. Doyle, U. S. Atty., and Marks Alexander, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Springfield, Ill., Theron L. Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Arthur L. Jacobs, Atty., Dept. of Justice, of Washington, D. C. and George A. Stinson, Ellis N. Slack, A. F. Prescott, and Clarence J. Nickman, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before KERNER and MINTON, Circuit Judges, and SWYGERT, District Judge.
United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
