HOWARD v. MASSACHUSETTS BONDING & INS. CO.

Civil 34—306.

69 F.Supp. 248 (1947)

HOWARD v. MASSACHUSETTS BONDING & INS. CO.

District Court, S. D. New York.

January 7, 1947.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emanuel Schwartz, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Clarke & Reilly, of New York City, for defendant.


BYERS, District Judge.

This is a defendant's motion for a directed verdict, made at the close of the case, and as to which decision was reserved. On December 19, 1946, the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $4,281.17, under instructions that the only question submitted to them was the amount of damage deemed to have been established, on the assumption that as a matter of law the plaintiff should prevail, but that as to such assumption the responsibility...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases