BRICTSON v. WOODROUGH

No. 13398.

164 F.2d 107 (1947)

BRICTSON v. WOODROUGH et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied December 5, 1947.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Luther Melin, of Minneapolis, Minn., for appellant.

Yale C. Holland, of Omaha, Neb. (G. L. DeLacy, Edwin Cassem and Kennedy, Holland, DeLacy & Svoboda, all of Omaha, Neb., on the brief), for appellees Joseph W. Woodrough, James M. Fitzgerald, William B. Rose and George A. Eberly, and others.

John L. Barton, of Omaha, Neb. (Raymond M. Crossman, of Omaha, Neb., on the brief), for appellees Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. and Ralph M. West.

Clinton Brome, of Omaha, Neb. (Charles E. Foster, of Omaha Neb., on the brief), for appellees Charles E. Foster, John T. Marcell, Harry S. Byrne, John A. Wear and pro se.

Francis S. Gaines, of Omaha, Neb. (Edward J. Shoemaker, of Omaha, Neb., on the brief), for appellee Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland.

William Ritchie, Jr., of Omaha, Neb., for appellees Ralph O. Canaday and pro se.

Wayne O. Stoehr, of Omaha, Neb. (Rosewater, Mecham, Schackelford & Stoehr, of Omaha, Neb., on the brief), for appellee Frank J. Taylor.

Robert J. Webb, of Omaha, Neb., for appellee pro se.

John A. McKenzie, of Omaha, Neb., for appellees pro se and William Whittaker.

Eugene D. O'Sullivan, of Omaha, Neb., for appellee M. O. Cunningham.

Harold M. Kelley, of Omaha, Neb., for appellee Western Surety Co.

William M. Giller, of Omaha, Neb., pro se.

A. C. R. Swenson, of Omaha, Neb., pro se. and others.

Lodowick F. Crofoot, William C. Fraser, Cornelius F. Connolly, Joseph B. Fradenburg and Sam Beber, all of Omaha, Neb., pro se.

Before PHILLIPS, HUXMAN and MURRAH, Circuit Judges for the Tenth Circuit, specially assigned.


PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

Brictson brought this action against 35 individual defendants and four corporations, seeking to recover damages for alleged wrongful acts alleged to have been done pursuant to and in furtherance of a conspiracy alleged to have been entered into by the several defendants other than the defendant, Brictson Manufacturing Company.1 The defendants interposed motions to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that it failed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases