1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 155 F.2d
  5. 155 F.2d 733 (1946)
 

BAUM v. PORTER

No. 277.

155 F.2d 733 (1946)

BAUM et al. v. PORTER, Price Administrator.

United States Emergency Court of Appeals.

Decided May 31, 1946.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Abraham Gottfried, of Los Angeles, Cal., for complainant.

Israel Convisser, Atty., of Office of Price Administration, of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Richard H. Field, Gen. Counsel, Jacob D. Hyman, Associate Gen. Counsel, and John O. Honnold, Jr., Chief, Court Review Price Branch, all of the Office of Price Administration, all of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before MARIS, Chief Judge, and MAGRUDER and McALLISTER, Judges.

Heard at Los Angeles, California, March 23, 1946.

PER CURIAM.

Complainant co-partnership is subject to Revised Maximum Price Regulation No. 287, which classifies women's outerwear garments in various categories, and among other provisions, requires a manufacturer to file spring and fall pricing charts for sales of such seasonal garments. Unless these charts are filed, manufacturers are not permitted to sell the garments in question. Complainant filed a spring...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases