UNITED BRICK & CLAY WORKERS v. JUNCTION CITY CLAY CO.

No. 10311.

158 F.2d 552 (1946)

UNITED BRICK & CLAY WORKERS OF AMERICA v. JUNCTION CITY CLAY CO. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

December 23, 1946.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. M. Rust, of Mansfield, Ohio, for appellant.

Louis E. Penfield and Cornelius J. Petzhold, both of Cincinnati, Ohio (Gerhard P. Van Arkel, A. Norman Somers, Dominick L. Manoli, and William J. Avrutis, all of Washington, D. C., Hubbard, Baker & Rice, of Chicago, Ill., Francis M. Thompson, of Columbus, Ohio, and Schweid, Snyder, Torbet & Zucker, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief; Paul H. Torbet, of Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel), for appellees.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

The appellant filed an action in the District Court, alleging that the appellees had engaged in a conspiracy in violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., 15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., and of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., and seeking equitable relief. The District Court dismissed the action.

The complaint in substance alleges that the appellant, the national...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases