HALLIBURTON CO. v. WALKER

No. 24.

329 U.S. 1 (1946)

HALLIBURTON OIL WELL CEMENTING CO. v. WALKER ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS DEPTHOGRAPH CO.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 18, 1946.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Earl Babcock reargued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. With him on the brief was Harry C. Robb.

Harold W. Mattingly reargued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.


MR. JUSTICE BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

Cranford P. Walker, owner of Patent No. 2,156,519, and the other respondents, licensees under the patent, brought this suit in a Federal District Court alleging that petitioner, Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Company, had infringed certain of the claims of the Walker patent. The District Court held the claims in issue valid and infringed by Halliburton. The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed, 146...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases