CROFOTT, NIELSEN & CO. v. McKINNEY

No. 10868.

148 F.2d 371 (1945)

CROFOTT, NIELSEN & CO. v. McKINNEY et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 15, 1945.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold W. Mattingly, of Los Angeles, Cal., and Joshua R. H. Potts and Eugene Vincent Clarke, both of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.

Avery M. Blount and Betty B. Gillette, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before DENMAN, STEPHENS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Appellant contends that the evidence of the use of appellant's patent as substantially against the public interest does not support the finding to that effect. We do not agree.

The judgment appealed from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases