1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 152 F.2d
  5. 152 F.2d 895 (1945)
 

CROSLEY CORP. v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC & MFG. CO.

Nos. 8581, 8600.

152 F.2d 895 (1945)

CROSLEY CORPORATION v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC & MFG. CO. (two cases).

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided December 14, 1945.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City (Christy, Parmelee & Strickland, of Pittsburgh, Pa., Floyd H. Crews, of New York City, and Alden D. Redfield, of Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

Carl S. Lloyd, of Chicago, Ill. (Victor S. Beam, of New York City, and Brown, Critchlow & Flick, of Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before GOODRICH and McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judges, and BARD, District Judge.

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.

These cross-appeals involve the validity and alleged infringement of nine patents relating to refrigerators. Each appeal concerns five patents, with one patent appearing in both appeals. On July 31, 1941, Crosley instituted suit against Westinghouse seeking a declaratory judgment of invalidity and noninfringement of sixteen patents owned by Westinghouse and declared by the latter to have been infringed by Crosley. Westinghouse counterclaimed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases