These appeals arise out of the alleged failure of the District Court to comply with the mandate of this court, which directed it to dismiss a petition of the debtor, Peer Manor Building Corporation, for its reorganization under Chapter X of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 501 et seq. The basis of our ruling was the lack of jurisdiction of the District Court over the closed bankrupt estate. Our opinion on this appeal is reported in
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
IN RE PEER MANOR BLDG. CORPORATION
Nos. 8468, 8475.
143 F.2d 764 (1944)
In re PEER MANOR BLDG. CORPORATION. PEER v. NIKOLAS et al. NIKOLAS et al. v. WITTER et al.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 14, 1944.
Rehearing Denied July 13, 1944.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
In Case No. 8468:
Maurice H. Kamm, of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
Walter E. Wiles and Geo. E. Q. Johnson, both of Chicago, Ill., (Frederick W. Eisenstein, of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellees.
In Case No. 8475:
Walter E. Wiles and George E. Q. Johnson, both of Chicago, Ill., for appellants.
Maurice H. Kamm, Harold J. Green, and Jules R. Green, all of Chicago, Ill., for appellees.
Before EVANS, KERNER, and MINTON, Circuit Judges.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
