LUMBER PRODUCTS ASS'N v. UNITED STATES

No. 10011.

144 F.2d 546 (1944)

LUMBER PRODUCTS ASS'N, Inc., et al. v. UNITED STATES.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied October 14, 1944.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maurice E. Harrison, Moses Lasky, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison and James M. Thomas, all of San Francisco, Cal., for Lumber Products Ass'n group of appellants.

Joseph O. Carson, II, of Indianapolis, Ind., Harry N. Routzohn, of Dayton, Ohio, and Hugh K. McKevitt and Jack M. Howard, both of San Francisco, Cal., for certain Labor Union appellants.

Joseph O. Carson, of Indianapolis, Ind., Charles H. Tuttle and Thomas E. Kerwin, both of New York City, and Hugh K. McKevitt, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America.

Clarence E. Todd, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant Alameda County Building & Construction Trades Council.

Morgan J. Doyle, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellants Boorman Lumber Co. et al.

Charles S. Burdell, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., of Seattle, Wash., and Joseph L. Alioto and George W. Hippeli, both of San Francisco, Cal., John S. Harlow, of Seattle, Wash., and James McI. Henderson, of San Francisco, Cal. (Tom C. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Frank J. Hennessy, U. S. Atty., of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GARRECHT, DENMAN, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.


DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court sentencing appellants for violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act,1 on finding the several appellants guilty or acting on pleas of nolo contendere. They were among a large group indicted on two counts for combining and conspiring to violate that Act. The second count was dismissed upon motion of the government...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases