IN RE HAMILTON

Patent Appeal No. 4867.

143 F.2d 364 (1944)

In re HAMILTON.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

May 22, 1944.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Archworth Martin, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

W. W. Cochran, of Washington, D. C. (E. L. Reynolds, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before BLAND, Acting Presiding Judge, and HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.


JACKSON, Associate Judge.

Appellant filed an application in the United States Patent Office for a patent alleging "a new and useful improvement in Grinding and Polishing Apparatus." All of the claims, 12 to 16 inclusive, were rejected by the Primary Examiner as unpatentable over the prior art, and upon appeal the Board of Appeals affirmed the examiner's decision. Appellant then appealed here.

Claim 12 is illustrative of the subject matter involved and reads...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases