SOCIETE VINICOLE DE CHAMPAGNE v. MUMM

No. 357.

143 F.2d 240 (1944)

SOCIETE VINICOLE DE CHAMPAGNE v. MUMM.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 13, 1944.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles B. Brophy and Jackson, Nash, Brophy, Barringer & Brooks, all of New York City, for the appellant.

Stewart L. Whitman, James L. Duncanson, and C. P. Goepel, all of New York City, for the appellee.

Watson Washburn and Perkins, Malone & Washburn, all of New York City, for G. H. Mumm Champagne (Societe Vinicole de Champagne, Successeurs) and Associates, Inc.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and FRANK, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

If the defendant had wished to challenge Judge Woolsey's original holding that his name was not "Mumm," but "Mumm von Schwarzenstein," the time to do so was when the decree was entered in 1937; it is now too late. Indeed, he does not ask us to unravel what was then done; on the contrary, as we understand it, he rests his case upon his change of name at the time of his naturalization, when apparently by order of the court he became no longer "Mumm von Schwarzenstein...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases