UNITED STATES v. STOTT

No. 12613.

140 F.2d 941 (1944)

UNITED STATES v. STOTT et ux.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

February 15, 1944.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger P. Marquis, Atty., Department of Justice, of Washington, D. C. (Norman M. Littell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Clinton R. Barry, U. S. Atty, of Fort Smith, Ark., John E. Harris, Sp. Asst. to the Atty. Gen., and Vernon L. Wilkinson, Atty., Department of Justice, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellant.

J. Bruce Streett, of Camden, Ark. (O. E. Westfall of Camden, Ark., on the brief), for appellees.

Before SANBORN, WOODROUGH, and RIDDICK, Circuit Judges.


RIDDICK, Circuit Judge, delivered the opinion of the Court.

The United States appeals from a judgment in a condemnation proceeding. The question is whether the appellees were bound by an agreement made prior to the institution of the action fixing the value of the lands taken.

On March 23, 1939, the appellees, Dan W. Stott and his wife, Maude Stott, executed and delivered to the United States seven options to purchase seven tracts of land, including in all...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases