1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 144 F.2d
  5. 144 F.2d 899 (1944)
 

IN RE HODNETTE

Patent Appeal No. 4915.

144 F.2d 899 (1944)

In re HODNETTE.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

Rehearing Denied October 2, 1944.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Otto H. Eschholz, of East Pittsburgh, Pa. (Ezra W. Savage, Franklin E. Hardy, and Jo. Baily Brown, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., of counsel), for appellant.

W. W. Cochran, of Washington, D. C. (R. F. Whitehead, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.

HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 21 to 25, inclusive, in appellant's application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to an induction apparatus, comprising a conducting coil and an interfitting magnetic coil, and a process for making the same.

Claims 21 and 22 define a magnetic core. Claim 23 defines...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases