1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 49 F.Supp.
  5. 49 F.Supp. 797 (1943)
 

ATCHISON, T. & S. F. RY. CO. v. WHITE

No. 2384-BH.

49 F.Supp. 797 (1943)

ATCHISON, T. & S. F. RY. CO. v. WHITE.

District Court, S. D. California, Central Division.

April 22, 1943.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan C. Gibson, M. W. Reed, L. W. Butterfield, and William F. Brooks, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

Arthur H. Glanz and Theodore W. Russell, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant.

HARRISON, District Judge.

This action was instituted by plaintiff against defendant to recover undercharges on 118 separate carload shipments made by defendant during the period of August, 1939, to February, 1941, which charges plaintiff contends must be collected in accordance with the lawfully published tariffs then in effect.

Like in the case of Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. Judson Freight Forwarding Company, etc., D.C.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases